What Makes Us Different From Other Tools On The Market?

Our platform monitors real user data in real time for issues with consent, privacy and data quality.

What Types Of Privacy-Related Regulations Do We Support?

Sentinel Insights supports privacy regulations that require proof of runtime consent enforcement, not just documentation. Our platform monitors for laws where compliance depends on how tags, signals like GPC, and third-party data flows behave in live user sessions, supported by timestamped, production-level evidence. Sentinel is regulation-agnostic because regulators ultimately ask the same question: when a user made a choice, what actually happened?

How Does Sentinel Insights Evaluate Your Websites To Identify And Flag Privacy Risks? Can I Customize Rules, Risk Thresholds, and Alerting Workflows?

Sentinel Insights evaluates websites by observing live behavior to see how tags, third-party requests, and data flows actually execute for real users under different consent states. This execution-level approach surfaces enforcement failures that static methods miss and preserves each event as timestamped evidence showing what ran, when, and under which conditions. A user can log into the dashboard for information or set up custom rules and alert thresholds for proactive management of consent, privacy and data quality.

What Problems Does Sentinel Insights Solve?

Sentinel Insights closes the governance gap by validating what actually happens around real user behavior for consent, privacy and data quality. There are many different use cases, so here are just a few examples: managing privacy and compliance regulations like CCPA and GDPR, supporting martech migrations from a new tag management solution/analytics/CDP, replace annual audit with real time monitoring, hundreds of hours saved for QA each year.

What Is The Difference Between Sentinel Insights and SentinelOne?

Sentinel Insights monitors consent signals and data governance anomalies, while SentinelOne provides endpoint detection and response for cybersecurity threats. One focuses on privacy and compliance intelligence; the other focuses on threat prevention and incident response. We are completely separate companies.

Pillsbury Whitepaper | Sentinel Insights

Hands forming a heart around a smaller heart, with black cuffs and accent lines.

We got it.

Thank you for contacting us.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Organizations are facing a growing enforcement gap between privacy consent signals and actual website behavior—an issue driving a surge in consent-related litigation and regulatory scrutiny.

Our new white paper explores how consent failures occur in production environments, even when Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) appear to function correctly. Through real-world examples, you'll learn how tracking technologies can continue to fire after an opt-out has been confirmed, creating hidden compliance risks that are often missed during routine privacy reviews.

Drawing on legal, technical, and operational privacy expertise, the white paper provides:

Insights into the legal and regulatory trends shaping recent consent-related enforcement actions.
A technical analysis of how consent breaks down within CMP and Tag Management System (TMS) implementations.
Practical guidance on operationalizing continuous validation to ensure consent preferences are being honored in production.

Inside the white paper, you'll discover:

Real examples of broken consent flows, including Global Privacy Control (GPC) failures.
Why CMPs are necessary but not sufficient for demonstrating compliance.
How to validate actual website behavior rather than relying solely on configuration assumptions.
Strategies for identifying and remediating consent enforcement gaps before they become legal or regulatory issues.

Download the white paper to better understand the risks associated with consent enforcement failures and learn how to verify that your privacy controls are working as intended.